Tithe like Nehemiah and Change your Community
Posted by Rastis in Church & Missions
In my last post I strongly affirmed the need to champion the cause of urban missions, whether at home or abroad (done right, urban ministry at home leads to ministry abroad), and to set apart those who are called to such a task. For a moment, forget the image of the city dweller living in a megalopolis. Of the 50% of the world’s population who live in cities, the majority of those live in cities around the quarter million mark. For the purpose of this post, if you don’t live on the farm but live within some proximity of people who are corporately joined together, you are in some kind of city. The way in which many individuals and organizations conduct missions sadly leaves the local church sidelined. We need to focus on plans which don’t simply pull out the future talent of a local church, but plans that are sustainable and help promote healthy sending churches as well as health missions projects and church plants. We need to come up with real solutions for how local churches can impact those dark areas of their city. We need to focus on how Nehemiah tithed.
Tithe Your People
Ray Bakke says that Nehemiah’s solution to the problem or rebuilding Jerusalem “was audacious and creative. He went to the small towns and suburbs where the people lived and asked for a human tithe, one out of every ten, to come and live in Jerusalem–the big bad city” (Bakke, Theology as Big as the City, 110. You can find the biblical reference in Nehemiah 11:1-2.).
Perhaps the idea of moving to a city should be literally practiced (I would argue in some cases it should), but we can also look at this more locally. I have lived in a number of small towns who had the proverbial “other side of the tracks.” These areas were poorer, more dangerous and more ethnic than where most of the church goers lived. In these contexts moving to the next larger city would almost be an act of hypocrisy, particularly if they only moved to the safer, richer, more ethnically homogeneous suburbs. In these small towns the churches needed to move a few people across the tracts to incarnate the gospel there and build bridges with their neighbors. If you move in more than ten percent, then it looks like some kind of invasion which inadvertently drives the prices up forcing out the poor people. The trend of young, affluent urbanites moving back into down town areas is part of the reason why the suburbs are becoming more diverse racially and economically. When one works overseas as a missionary much thought goes into where they live, particularly when the team is small and the city is large. Why, when the church has so many resources and such a high concentration and ratio of Christians do they not encourage–if not help–their people to expand into unreached nooks of their own towns and counties?
Commission the Laity
In order to reach into every neighborhood in your suburb, city, town, or county we must incorporate the full body of Christ. These people must be commissioned and sent outward. Many people think that their greatest act of ministry is drag their lost friends to church. This act affirms that the world out there is bad, and the world in here is good; work done outside the church is just to hold us over till we can come back to sacred space; and work done in the church pleases God while we hope he turns a blind eye to those who choose second best and work as farmers, doctors, truckers, teachers, etc. People need to see that their daily work is to be both service to God and mission–Church should be the side effect of these two done well.
Commissioning the laity
- Affirms the inherent worth of all believers to accomplish the purposes of God.
- Denies the platonic dualism between ministry and secular work so often found western Christianity which equates serving God with doing something in church or on a mission trip.
- Mobilizes a largely untapped resource and engages the community in their space: the street, the neighborhood, the workplace.
- Affirms that God’s mission is to claim the whole earth for his glory, churches, schools, businesses, shops, streets, neighborhoods, etc.
- Changes the local church from a place where overripe stock come to be fed yet again, to a training ground for workers actively engaging in the great commission.
- Reaches people and places that are otherwise not reachable through church programs.
I remember a mission trip I took with SEBTS to New York City. After spending some time going through the city, we went to the top of the Empire State Building and looked out. I saw high-rise after high-rise of people. We could fully fund a few missionaries who we send out from our church. We could try to plant traditional churches there. There is a problem, however, in finding space, and paying for any space we might find. These methods are simply too costly and too slow. What we need to reach a city like NYC, is an army of trained and commissioned laity who have jobs as bankers, programmers, secretaries, teachers and the like, to intentionally move into different buildings and offices.
If you look at your community, no matter how small or large, there are probably those places untouched by gospel witness. Will we commute the gospel into those neighborhoods as though they are untouchables? Will we affix speakers to the steeples (like the mosques here have) and hope the mystical power of the Bible will somehow transform the community? The early church did not wait for people to experience a calling before sending them out. They chose from among themselves people who should go, commissioned them, and sent them out. Do we have the courage to do the same?



Rastis,
I appreciate your desire to effect change for Christ among those parts of the community that are often ignored. But, I wonder if your approach does not also cause those with non-vocational ministry related jobs to feel illegitimate as long as they do not somehow make their vocation into a mission. Must a person working as a teacher use her vocation as a Christian mission to be pleasing to the Lord? Or, can she work as unto the Lord without using her work as a means to evangelism? What if a person works as a teacher in a public school where it is inappropriate to propagate one religion over another? Should she feel illegitimate or is vocation itself pleasing to the Lord without having to make it a mission?
My apologies. I didn’t communicate that clearly enough. I am arguing that all good work is redeemable (i don’t see the roles of stripper or pimp as something redeemable in that sense. In need of redemption, but these are categories we must reject) and as such anyone, even those–and perhaps particularly those–who are not in vocational ministry can fulfill God’s will for the whole community. Perhaps the problem is that when we hear the word redemption we only think the salvation of souls and not the restoration of creation.
Here is an example of how I would look at restoring a neighborhood. Commission the laity. This does not necessarily mean that everyone now views themselves as no longer secular bub now a missionary, rather we are affirming that all good work is from God and for his purpose. We send 10% in the that local troubled neighborhood. These are not pastors or staff. These are people with everyday jobs who through their jobs are restoring broken systems. The issues are poverty, out of wedlock pregnancies, drugs, crime, etc, in this neighborhood have diverse causes and thus the answer needs to be holistic. Someone who teaches but does not use their job as a platform to preach is still partnering with God in restoring this neighborhood. So does everyone who seeks to honor God through their work.
That being said, gospel proclamation needs to not only be in common grace ways, but also cristo-centric. If you read much of my writings in this blog or my personal one, one of my big gripes is people who employ bait and switch methods of evangelism. Nevertheless, we are all called to bear testimony to what Christ has done through the cross. Some times this is welcome, and some times we will be outcasts for doing so. It is not an either/or, it is both/and.
I think it is problematic to reduce the gospel to simple eternal salvation. At the same time, it is problematic to remove the eternal cristo-centric dimensions as well.
Thank you for reading and I appreciate the thoughtful questions.
It seems to me there is an important difference between going where your “secular” work would normally take you, and trying to make a positive impact for the Kingdom of God, and intentionally picking up and moving somewhere you would not otherwise go if it were not for a specific calling from God. Though we should definitely not discourage those who are doing the first thing, many places in the world will only be reached by an important influx of the second type of people.
David, I am not aware of anyone doing this per se. I got the idea from Ray Bakke’s “Theology as Big as the City.” He has written in his other book (Urban Christian)about their church in Chicago commissioning their laity in their secular jobs. Some of this had to do with the common grace side (If I am a good teacher, I am fixing creation) but it also had to do with the missions side as well. He would visit his people at their place of work which would usually draw a crowd. He would tell those who gathered that the man/woman from his congregation was God’s representative to them and if they needed prayer or counsel that they were the person to go to.
Hirsch and Frost have also documented a number of close cases in their various works (“Shaping of things to come” and “Exiles” are the two that come to mind). In the Shaping of Things to Come, they tell the story of a man who went to San Francisco to open a high-end shoe store. Through his love of shoes and love for his customers, he was able to minister to people who would never consider going to a traditional church. Frost, when he was Pastoring in Sydney would choose one person from the congregation each week to stand up and tell the church what he did for a job. The the members would then take a few minutes for people to share the ways in which that person’s job fulfilled either the cultural commission or the great commission.
Finally, Schaeffer’s writings are full of references to holistic nonsecular categories which reject the secular-sacred divide.
I agree that there is a difference between being a light were you are and moving to a new place. I think we need both. Any given church has people scattered through neighborhoods and businesses already. There is no need to forsake these completely. However, we do need to focus on the areas that are typically overlooked.
Rastis,
Do you know of any books or articles containing real-life modern-day stories of people who have done what you are advocating here? I think it would be helpful for people to have some sort of a model to follow, since this idea is pretty out-of-the-box for most people in our churches. Almost certainly, to reach the cities, it is going to take out-of-the-box ideas, though.
Here’s a pretty good article on the subject that is about Southern Baptists (I know it would be a turn off for some to give an example from certain “missional” organizations).
http://www.commissionstories.com/stories/283
Hey, I would love to read that, but the link is messed up….
It looks like Commission Stories is off-line, hopefully just temporarily.
[...] “Tithe Like Nehemiah and Change Your Community,” by Rastis at the SBC Impact blog, with a challenge for laypersons to engage more personally in changing the world through more sacrificial giving. [...]