Church Planting and Humanitarian Aid
Posted by Strider in Church & Missions
With the recent events in Haiti I thought that I would post how we do disaster response here. I hope this post will encourage you to minister in the times of disaster and to do so effectively.
There are many ways to plant churches in this world. Many describe Church planting as ‘Churches planting Churches’. The Church is the Body of Christ and this Body is given the gifts that will make the work of the Kingdom possible. Its strength lies in the fact that motives are clear and the message unmistakable. The ambassadors of Christ come to represent Christ. It is simple and uncluttered. Everyone knows why everyone else is there and what they are supposed to be doing. We have done the work like this for over 200 years and we have lots of history and tradition to learn from and draw on. We know there are pitfalls and we have seen them overcome.
There are some obstacles that might not be apparent with this though. This method pays for an outside worker to come into a new place and develop a national leadership that sends out inside workers to its own people. Money is always an issue in the emerging Church. Where do you find the funds? Can the nationals raise their own support? If a paid Church Planter (CPer) comes to a village and shares his faith and someone accepts can that someone not expect to be paid to go share their faith as well? In a very poor or suffering village how will the church show compassion? Is just teaching enough? If they come to a village and help out a local family who is struggling and that family comes to faith do we know why they came to faith? Do they know why they came to faith? What will the other villagers think of this? Will this new believer’s testimony be credible? What about security in a restricted place? Can believers- national or expat- go to restricted areas and share openly? If they can not then what will they do to reach these areas? If they do get there how will they be heard in a hostile environment? How will disciples be made and grown before outside oppression snuffs out the new budding faith of a young believer? I could go on and on. These questions are not unanswerable and these situations are not insurmountable. But the problems must not be ignored. They must be addressed and tackled if we want to see healthy communities of Faith grow and mature.
Our team has chosen to answer these problems with a humanitarian aid organization. This is the NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) Approach. We began in 1997 and to date we have seen four church starts. Two of these no longer exist and two are doing very well. We have evolved in our understanding of what we are doing over the years. I will not recount that journey here. Instead I will list some principles by which we operate that will help give an idea of what we do and why we do it. Let me say right at the beginning here that I am a big believer in the ‘Walls of Jericho’ concept. What we have done here is unique and should not be repeated. The only lesson we can take from Jericho is to act in obedience to the Lord! Please don’t go marching around cities expecting the walls to fall down unless the Lord has commanded you to do just that. The same goes for any strategy to reach any new area. We must hear from the Lord and do it unapologetically. With that disclaimer here is our approach.
There are many disasters here in Middle Earth. I often joke that Gondor is the only country in the world where you can do disaster response full time. We saw that the people were suffering and no one was responding. So, we began responding to the needs. Principle number one: Walk into a place and asked the Holy Spirit what these people need. Then begin meeting that need. I am a Music Major with a Master of Divinity degree. This hardly qualifies me to be a disaster response expert. But God gave our team unqualified favor to do this work. We made many good decisions and we were able to offer real leadership to communities experiencing disaster. Principle number two: The Holy Spirit will gift you to do all that He is calling you to. Or, He gives you the authority to act where he is calling you to act. We were able to build a solid reputation in our country and as a result we have access to sensitive areas where no one else is able to go. We have worked in the remote mountains and along the very sensitive Mordor border. We have done a couple of projects in Mordor itself and in 1998 even opened an office there that is still there today. Our goal has always been to impact the entire country and the region as we had opportunity. I have been very irritated to talk to fellow workers who do not believe that we can offer the kind of large scale effective aid that the Red Cross or other large humanitarian aid agencies can provide. We can and should do much better than those agencies. We have the unlimited resources of the Father, the wisdom and compassion of the Son, and the guidance and power of the Holy Spirit. Principle number three: No small visions. This is a very important principle for us as without it we remain in our own strength and forfeit the opportunity to see God work in our lives and ministries.
When we encounter a disaster we have a team of believing guys who go and do assessment. While doing assessment we listen to people and we pray with them and for them. This is culturally appropriate and introduces us to the community as men of faith. After the disaster we continue to witness through our lives as we work with the community to recover from the effects of disaster and return to normalcy. During this time we have found what I call ‘in your face’ evangelism to be utterly useless. People can not hear us and have no context with which to understand our words. So, we live out our faith very publicly. Everything we do is worship. We get up in the morning and pray together. We sing songs, read the Word, and serve others openly. It is important to be understood on this point: We unveil our personal lives with God before the villagers whom we serve. We never tell anyone that they must do this or that or that they must believe this or that. We tell each other in front of the villagers that Jesus is Lord and we encourage each other with scripture and discuss the Word and God’s plan in front of everyone we can. Principle number four: Everything you do must be worship to God. This results in a lot of joy on the team. We are quick to laugh, love, and serve. This sets an example to the whole village as to what a believer is and does. Principle number five: Discipleship begins when you meet someone. There are four national guys on the team and we have as many as two or on a rare occasion three expats on site as well. We model for the village a true Christian community. One day we pulled into a new village and as we unloaded the truck and set up the field office some village leaders came over to me and said, ‘who are these guys? Are they followers of Jesus?’ Ten minutes was all it took for them to see how different these guys behaved from everyone else. They had not said anything about Jesus. They had not passed out Christian literature. Their lives spoke of a love and peace that was foreign to the culture we are serving.
As people have come to faith through the work we have done I have been very pleased with the results. No one asks for money. Our guys work hard doing NGO work and that is understood as the reason they get a pay check. Everything they say and do for Jesus is out of love for Him not for money. Another big advantage to this work is that we serve whole communities. We give aid out to whole communities regardless of their coming to a Bible study or being baptized. This means that the ‘rice Christian’ issue has not really existed for us. The people who have come to faith through our work have gone on to work harder than ever at their secular jobs and have more money than they ever had before. Another great benefit that we have seen is the resulting new Christian community has a better organizational model than we can provide from the West. New believers are not given a ‘come to the building we call Church’ model. They are shown a living community that meets everyday and worships all the time. We have left them free to form whatever organizational model fits with their context. Principle number six: We share the Good News of the Kingdom and let Christ build His Church as He sees fit.
This leads to another principle. I hate extraction evangelism. The idea that we go somewhere and share Christ with one person and disciple him or her apart from any community is very foreign to the New Testament. Pretty much you have the example of Philip and the Eunuch and that is it. Paul shared openly and discipled openly even in hostile situations. We can not have house churches until we have reached households. We must focus on the existing community- as Paul did- and then see how God will redeem it and bring about a new community of faith. Western methodologies are utterly bankrupt here. We must recover real community in our own life and learn to live it in a contagious way before the communities we serve. Principle number seven: You reap what you sow. Sow to an individual, reap an individual, sow to a community, reap a community. I believe that the NGO doing humanitarian aid is the best way to do this among communities that are hostile to the truth and are politically restrictive. More and more NGO’s are finding restrictions and many are turning to BAM- Business as Mission- to overcome the barriers. Someone with more experience than I will need to write the post on how we do that!
There is more that I could say. We have a whole different set of principles that go with how we provide humanitarian aid. But I think I will conclude here and let you ask questions as you need to. Thanks for this opportunity to share what God has been doing in us and through us. It has been an exciting ride.



I’ve been following the U.S. Baptist in Haiti as much as possible. They were not church planting but have created much of their own problems by not establishing “principals” as you have laid out. Without a designed biblical plan to go by our works become the works of man for the glory of man, not God. The people who work along side us will not benefit from the faith required by following God’s principles.
Good post. I look forward to hearing from others.
Excellent post, Strider.
Continuing to pray for your efforts there in Mordor. I love your questions and will be using them in my college-age Sunday School class this coming week. I’ve been going through the gospel of Mark discussing what our relationship is to the gospel and how we live it out. There is a great deal of ammunition here for kids as they prepare to go out into the world. One of my students is studying nursing and planning on medical ministry after graduation, helping with a nurse practitioner school. I believe your message here will encourage and inspire her.
God bless and keep up the good work.
rick
Strider,
Thanks for sharing these insights into how you go about the Master’s business there in Middle Earth. As I have shared before, I am grateful, as a Southern Baptist, to be able to have a part in supporting work like what you are involved in there. When I read about the principles you share here, I believe we all have good reason to be proud, in a healthy sort of way, to be affiliated with what you and your team, and others doing similar work in various places around the world, are doing.
I do have a question (not a criticism). When people do come to Christ, and you begin to disciple them, do you try to teach them in any way about what the NT teaches about church? Or, do you leave that completely up to them to sort out on their own as they study Scripture for themselves?
Thanks for the good comments guys.
David, to answer your question is a whole nuther post! But, in brief it goes back to the discipleship issue. We are teaching by word, by Word, and by example- but honestly, mostly by example! For instance, in the church we started in a village a couple of years ago they had never seen any example of Christianity before they saw us. So, what do they do? How do they ‘do’ Church? The answer was that they did exactly as we did. When in the village on the project we got up every morning, prayed, read the Word together, sang songs of worship, and went out and served others. This is exactly what they do now- every day! Church for them is not an organization but the redeemed community worshiping the Lord.
There is a lot more to say here but like I said, that is another post altogether. Maybe in March?
I should also say that I considered criticizing the Idaho Baptist in Haiti who are in trouble now but I really can’t do that because I really don’t know what actually happened. There is a lot of hear-say going on in that situation so I wont judge them. But in terms of principles it is being reported that they went with a specific agenda to rescue orphans. If true then there are problems with that. What is really going on on the ground? What is the Holy Spirit saying to do. Just because it is something you are interested in does not make it the best thing to do.
Second, they reportedly did not have a good plan in place for helping orphans. If they were going to gather them and move them they needed a much better plan than hoping something would materialize later in the Dominican Republic.
Third, because they were reportedly agenda driven it seems that their translators made thing happen for them that should not have happened. Nationals who need your help will aim to please. In this case, it seems that non-orphans were rounded up and paper work was short-changed.
So, from what we know- which is a lot of conflicting info- this team seems to have come with an agenda and then with no trusted national partner on the ground they got themselves in a situation that they did not understand and now people who came to help not only did not help but are being prosecuted for failing to help! It is outrageous and I certainly think they should be released but if the above issues are real then we need to address them in our work and avoid them at all costs.
Good points, Strider.
It would seem that one of the principles before any mission work begins would be “prayer and fasting” in order to separate or distinguish the flesh from the Spirit, error from truth and man’s will from God’s will. We seldom see the necessity and benefit of this and occasionally walk headlong into Satan’s trap.
There has been a letter sent to President Obama from the SBC. http://bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=32224
Strider,
Praise God brother!…. Your comment in post #4 is the way it should be…. it is so clear how that the American culture seems to “form worship” for most folks,… contrasted against the Holy Spirit forming worship in us (kissing toward God) as we meet together, whatever the day and in whatever the place.
What an encouragement!…and something we should take to heart as we live and work in the North American continent as well.
Blessings,
Chris
Strider, I enjoy your posts for their relevance and for their common sense.
I will give you a couple of instances where I have seen disaster relief ministries become catalyst for church planting. I have been involved in 4 disaster related situations in other countries. We are not as well organized as you seem to be and mainly plan according to the immediate situation. Our disasters do not occur every year but are happening more and more often. A few years ago I was asked to coordinate disaster relief for an earthquake in our country even though, like you, I had no preparation in the way of training for the task. Being a smart person, I immediately began to delegate. We were an open country. There was a village near the epicenter where most of the homes had been destroyed. There had never been a Christian witness in this village and it was strongly involved in idol worship and folk religion. Many of the idols had been destroyed by the earthquake. Even though we were involved in different degrees of ministry in different parts of the country we assigned one team to concentrate on this village for a permanent presence. A national layperson began setting up a distribution point for food, tents, and other items and lived there in a tent for many weeks. There were a couple of missionary couples who also stayed there in tents for shorter periods of time. We coordinated with national churches that would bring medical teams and other personnel in at different times. We also helped in constructing temporary housing. To make a long story short, a church was established there. Comments of the people were that the local non Christian religious organization and the government came through but didn’t stay to help us. They also recognized their idols had been of no help. Missionaries worked mainly in support roles. I was blessed to be invited to a dedication service for the church about two years ago.
I was involved in another disaster relief situation in a closed country. This was an earthquake situation also. I had a very minor role but we were able to provide a needed piece of equipment. We then recruited national believers from other parts of the country to come be trained in the installation and operation of the equipment. The nationals would then go as teams of two to villages and install and stay and operate the equipment while living in a tent. I believe they were able to go to 40 or 50 villages in this way. They used this opportunity to be a witness in the villages. In some cases churches were started. In most cases this was the first witness to be in their village.
We were targeting communities but that still involved building relationships and evangelizing individuals. David, we also taught the basics of what the NT taught about the Church but still let them study the scripture for themselves. In any case Strider is right. They often model what they first observe. You always have a plan but you must remain flexible enough to follow the leading of the Holy Spirit as he brings people into your path. If possible, it is best to work with or through the local believers and let them take the lead with support from you. In the open country, a pastor who was from a nearby area moved to the village to serve as pastor with financial support from outside but has local support now. In the closed country, house churches with no financial support from outside were formed. I am told that there are about 900 Baptist churches in Haiti and we are working through those churches.
Strider, what do you mean by BAM?
Bruce, The best advice I ever got was from an old mentor who said, ‘Listen to what the Holy Spirit says this people need and start doing that.’ We wont get far if we don’t begin by listening.
Chris, I hear you about the nature of Church. My next post will address this directly.
Ron, It is great to hear that you guys have ministered to people when they needed it the most. The Boss has blessed and will continue to bless us when we care for hurting people.
BAM? Get with the new lingo man! The latest fad is Business As Mission. But joking aside it will be critical to get to some of the places we have not got to yet.
Strider,
I am so old fashion I still use FMB and furlough. Forget me ever understanding the different between “The IMB” and “IMB”. Seriously, I do not know what the term Business as Mission refers to.
Never mind Strider. I googled it. Of course I am familiar with the concept, just not the term. It reminds we of the old Tent Maker Program we had but foolishly did away with at the IMB. I agree there is great untapped potential there.