Praying for the Sick
Posted by David Rogers in Bible & Theology
*I originally posted this on my personal blog, Love Each Stone, on Nov. 10, 2007, after a 3-week mission trip I had taken to India.
One of the most significant memories that will stick with me from my visit to India is the several occasions on which I was asked to pray, one by one, for sick people after several of the meetings in which we participated. Although, as I have previously indicated on various occasions on this blog, I am a continuationist, and believe in the current operation of the so-called “sign gifts,” I have not, in the past, been quite so intensely involved in praying for sick people as I was on this trip to India.
This was not something that I sought out on my own. I was asked, on several occasions, if I would be willing to pray for the sick. Believing that, in some way or another, God might be able to use me, I agreed to do so. After the meetings, the people lined up, and one by one, I asked them what was their particular prayer request, laid my hands on them, and lifted them before the Father. Some of them brought with them a small vial of oil, and handed it to me. In those cases, I poured a little bit on my hands, and rubbed it on their head, as I prayed for them.
While I was in India, I was told that pretty much across the board, throughout all the Christian groups and denominations that are seeing any significant response to the Gospel, a good part of this response is linked to praying for the sick and miraculous healing. From what I have read, in books such as The Next Christendom by Philip Jenkins, this is true as well for most areas of the world that are experiencing significant church growth, especially among the so-called “two-thirds world.”
I cannot say for sure whether anyone I prayed for was healed as a result of my prayers. I did not ask them directly. However, this experience in my life gave me cause to reflect on the whole issue of praying for the sick. The following are some of my observations:
*God still miraculously heals people today. From my study of Scripture, I see no reason to conclude this is not the case. I have also heard too many credible testimonies of miraculous healing to discard them as mere emotionalism or exaggeration.
*The term “the gift of healing” is a red herring in the whole discussion on continuationism. The biblical text, in the original Greek, says literally, “gifts of healings” (1 Corinthians 12:9, 28). As such, the argument that, if someone had “the gift of healing,” they ought to be able to go into hospitals and heal people indiscriminately, is unfounded. I believe that God, in his sovereignty, has distributed the gift of being able to pray for people, and see God heal them as a response, in differing degrees, to different people, in different circumstances, at different times.
*I also believe that physical healing is included in the atonement. A thorough examination of the biblical context of the phrase “by his wounds we are healed” (Isaiah 53:5, 1 Peter 2:24) makes it hard to relegate it to the strictly spiritual sphere. However, the full effects of Jesus’ death on the cross, especially in the physical realm, are not extended to us completely until “the redemption of our bodies” at the last day (Romans 8:18-25; Revelation 21:4). This does not preclude the possibility of God, on occasion, sovereignly bringing forward, into the present day, some of the blessings reserved for us, as his children, in eternity. In the biblical records of miraculous healing (both O.T and N.T.), I believe this is precisely what happened. Whenever God miraculously heals, whether physically, psychologically, or spiritually, He does so on the basis of the blessings won for us by Jesus on the cross of Calvary (see also Exodus 15:22-26).
*I believe that many who purport to have “the gift of healing” are spiritual charlatans. Whenever people use supposed spiritual gifts, accompanied by manipulative techniques and a motivation of personal aggrandizement, there is no way that God can be pleased. Therefore, as believers, we need to use a healthy dose of spiritual discernment in our evaluation and support of such ministries. However, I believe we need to be careful, at the same time, to not “throw the baby out with the bath water.”
*I also believe that the degree of our faith does play a role in the efficacy of our prayers for healing. There are too many verses in the Bible that say this too clearly to deny that it is so. However, I believe that, at the same time, it is a travesty to lay the blame for people not being healed on the supposed lack of faith of those being prayed for. Biblically, there is evidence of God responding to the faith of the sick person him/herself, the faith of the one praying for the sick person, and the faith of the one bringing a sick person to someone else so that they might pray for them. I also believe that it is blatant Scripture-twisting, not to mention extreme irresponsibility, to suggest that going to the doctor and taking medicine manifests a lack of faith.
*One of the main motivations for healing in the Bible is compassion towards those who are suffering. As a result, whenever we pray for someone who is sick, we need to be very careful to do so in such a way as to not add to their suffering by either laying the burden of the responsibility for their healing on their faith or lack thereof, or raising their expectations for miraculous healing, only to send them crashing down to the ground afterwards.
*Although it is certain that not all sickness comes as the result of individual sin (John 9:1-3), it is also true that many ailments, whether spiritual, psychological, or physical, have their root in unconfessed sin in our lives. I believe the context of the passage in James on calling for the elders to pray for the sick (James 5:13-16) implies taking this possibility into consideration (“if he has sinned, he will be forgiven”). As ministers of God’s grace, though, we need to be very careful, compassionate, and spiritually discerning, in the way we deal with this.
*I do not believe all sickness comes as a result of demonic activity. However, there does appear to be a clear link, in many instances recorded in the Bible, to certain physical conditions and spiritual bondage. I believe that some people are more spiritually gifted than others at discerning when this is the case. I also believe that our authority, as believers, over the power of the enemy and the spiritual bondage he inflicts, is more direct and complete in this present age, than any authority God may happen to give us over purely physical phenomena. As a result, I believe it is generally a good thing, whenever we sense that demonic activity or spiritual bondage may be at the root of physical sickness, to appropriate in faith the authority God gives us as his children over “all the power of the enemy” (Luke 10:19).
*For some reason, God’s miraculous power in healing seems to be more active in certain areas of the world, and in certain periods of history, than others. We therefore need to be careful not to judge what God may be doing in a certain place, at a certain time, on the basis of what we may have observed at another place and another time.
*At the present time, from all evidence, God appears to be working in unusual ways in many places around the world to raise spiritual awareness and prepare a great harvest of souls. Much of this seems to be tied in with miraculous healing. I believe that we, as God’s servants, and particularly as those associated with Southern Baptist missionary efforts, need to be “in tune” to what God is doing, and join him where He is at work around the world. While we do need to use discernment and not be too quick to jump on the bandwagon of the latest spiritual fads, we, at the same time, need to be just as careful to not cast a scornful eye, and miss out on some of the mighty works of God, as a result of our spiritual skepticism and cultural presuppositions.



Brother David,
This article slipped in and I am just now reading it….very good stuff! The Apostle James gives us imperatives….
James 5:16 “Therefore, confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another so that you may be healed. The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much.”
It is a great privilege to pray for our brothers and sisters. We do this a great deal in our church. We call for the elders to pray for the sick and God is healing. It is amazing to see God work.
Praying seems to be greatly misunderstood I think…because many people think it is their doing (while in prayer) and not God’s effectiveness that is on display. God commands us to pray, so we must!
Blessings,
Chris
The passage from James has always puzzled me. If the elders pray over and anoint a sick brother, he will be healed AND his sins (if he has any) will be forgiven. Great. But James was obviously writing to Christians, whose sins were already forgiven. Why did they need additional forgiveness?
Also, why do we not anoint with oil? It was an act that clearly had great symbolic meaning, even in the Old Testament. We take all the examples about baptism very literally, but ignore the example of using oil on the sick.
Brother Patrick,
James 5 is an interesting text. I didn’t know if you were asking David or if anyone, so I will attempt an answer.
As far as sins,…the Apostle Paul as well as James intimate the same consequences of sins brought forward in the James passage, especially the same teaching as Paul revealed to the church in Corinth… 1 Corinthians 11, “because of your defiling of the Lord’s Table many of you are weak and sick, and some of you are dead,”… of course the ones who were dead obviously didn’t hear what he was saying, but I think the others got the message.
The anointing of oil may be observed…there is no right or wrong way here of course. But, the elders should come together and pray,… anointing with oil not being prohibited, nor does it create anything magical.
Blessings,
Chris
I’ve had enough folks over whom I’ve prayed, testify that God healed them, that I believe firmly God does that. When He desires their healing, and for His glory.
Jesus had perfect communication with God, and knew precisely what God willed in every case. My communication, on the other hand, is lousy, so I don’t know what God wants, so my experience when it comes to healing is much more irregular.
And only once was oil ever used, and that time, we didn’t know anything had happened until some time later.
Bro Chris, thank you for the thoughts. I’ve never heard anyone say anointing is forbidden. Everyone seems to agree it might be a good thing. I just cannot recall ever seeing it done in an SBC church.
To me this seems at odds with the passage. James says the elders should pray over the sick person AND anoint him with oil. Yet the widespread interpretation is that 1) prayer is mandatory but 2) anointing is optional. On what exegetical basis do we take the first part so literally but not the second? I just do not see it in the text.
I think this is something where our more charismatic brethren may be on the right track.
Patrick,
I am open for dialogue and correction on this point, as I realize there are some particularities in which it seems Scripture leaves the door open for variant interpretations.
Having said that, I believe that the forgiveness of sins referenced in James 5:15 correlates to the forgiveness of sins in 1 John 1:8-10, which, it seems to me, is also directed toward those who are already believers.
On the one hand, I believe that those who receive the free gift of justification bought by Jesus at the cross of Calvary, also receive, at the same time, the forgiveness of their sins, past, present, and future, and pass, at this moment, from death unto life. I also believe, as Romans 8:1 teaches, that there is no condemnation for all those who are in Christ Jesus.
However, I believe there is also a daily confession of sin and practical application of the cleansing made available in the atonement of Christ. If not, why would Jesus teach us to pray “forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us”?
I also believe that Jesus’ words to Peter in John 13:10 at the time he washed the disciples’ feet—”A person who has had a bath needs only to wash his feet; his whole body is clean”—has a metaphorical allusion to this same truth.
I also agree with Chris that anointing with oil does not have a magical effect. However, I believe it may be a physical point of contact that helps us to symbolically express our faith and dependence on God himself in healing.
Patrick,
Just saw your comment #5. I think that perhaps some SBC churches tend to avoid anointing with oil out of fear of communicating a “magical” approach to healing. However, I agree with you that, since Scripture clearly teaches it, it is best to stick with what Scripture says, though, at the same time, taking care to see that a “magical” approach is not understood by what we are doing.
David,
When I was in India for a couple of weeks this past fall, I experienced much the same thing that you did. Our team probably laid hands on 150 people, praying specifically either for blessing or physical healing. As for “oil,” none of us had any, but we used what we had (do you think hand sanitizer has the same effect?). I was humbled to be a part of such a ministry.
I wouldn’t call praying for the sick a “regular” part of my ministry, but it certainly not an uncommon one. In fact, we anointed, laid hands on, and prayed for a member of our house church last Sunday. About 18 months ago, one of our seminary students had a very serious illness that no doctors could identify (the best they could guess was a “floating tumor” about the size of a pinhead somewhere in his body). It was about to kill him. Greatly burdened about this, I called our entire seminary to a special prayer session for this student. I studied the entire book of James to understand that passage in 5:13-18. I did a short exposition of the text, we had the student share the details of his physical condition with the group, we had a time of confession and cleansing, then called the people forward to anoint, lay hands, and pray. It was a wonderful time of cleansing, compassion, and care. No “instant healing,” but within one year the student was given a clean bill of health, and is now in training camp to go overseas with the Canadian military.
Here are a few thoughts I gleaned from my study of James 5:13-18.
1. This is not an “everyday illness” presented here – a serious illness. The physical burden of the illness for the patient has now become the concern of the body, and they now have a chance to “bear one another’s burdens” (Gal 6:2).
2. The procedure described: call the elders (v. 14), anoint with oil probably as an “acted prayer” that is specifically focused (v. 14), confess sins to one another (v. 16), and pray over him in faith and earnestness (vv. 14, 15, 17).
3. James gives some “conditions,” directives on prayer throughout the book. First, the prayer must be offered by those in right standing with God (5:16-18). Second, the prayer must be offered “in faith” (1:6-7), with the full assurance that God can heal and will heal in His will. Third, the prayer must be offered with godly motives (4:1-3), that is, for His glory alone, to see God glorified through the patient’s life and body. Fourth, the prayer must be conditioned on God’s sovereign will (4:15).
4. All of this led me to some concluding thoughts. First, the focus of all of this is upon God, not even on the sick person. Second, there is more than one kind of sickness and more than one kind of healing are presented here (e.g. physical – healing and spiritual – forgiveness). Third, the condition of the participants’ heart (the sick person, the pray-er) is vitally important. There is noting rote or automatic about this activity.
For what it’s worth,
Kevin
Chris, Bob, & Kevin,
Thanks for your thoughts on this. I agree with what each of you has said.
I have read some expositions of James 5:13-18 making the case that anointing with oil actually had some kind of medicinal purpose, and that the healing talked about here was not necessarily supernatural. I am not convinced by those arguments, though.
We can pull from every source supplied from Scripture related to healing and never come up with a formula or a step by step plan that would cause or influence God to act in accordance to our personal desires to be healed. It is all about God being glorified. We are merely vessels of His grace and should approach healing with His glory in mind no matter what the outcome.
Unfortunately, too many churches, TV preachers and tent revivals have distorted the wonderful plan by which God desires to heal within the body of Christ. The approach to healing within any church should bring everyone together to look to God for his wonderful plan to be revealed. From there, it would allow the other gifts within the body to function and exercise themselves for the whole body to be healthy. Too many leaders allow the body to be weak from false claims, neglect of proper teaching and fleshly approaches to healing.
Removal of the sickness is only one facet of the diamond that reflects God’s glory. If Paul forfieted his thorn in the flesh for the grace that was sufficiently supplied, we may never have had the truths only God supplies through suffering, again, when blindness is removed by our Lord and the comments are made in John 9:25 in total confidence about what had happened, it encourages us today to fight the good fight of faith no matter what happens. We must rely upon the Potter and how he molds and plans our life.
Bruce,
Good words. I agree with your approach on this as well.
Unfortunately, it seems like in many cases, groups of Christians gravitate toward two extremes—either going “healing-happy” in a way that, for all practical purposes, seeks to control or manipulate God and/or others, or being closed-minded to God’s supernatural sovereign working. At the same time, I am encouraged, however, by the amount of people who seem to be confessing and practicing a more balanced approach on this issue.
Brother David,
Good comments by all here…
I like what you said,…in that it is never a bad thing to do what the scriptures direct. Anointing with oil is reflective of the work of the Spirit, so it would make historical sense to these Jews as they were using the anointing in this manner with prayer. Olive oil and its usage throughout the scriptures does shed some light on the reason that James has included it in his letter.
Blessings,
Chris
David,
Good article on healing. God doesn’t always chose to heal, but it is a great thing when He does.
David R. Brumbelow
David,
Write something I disagree with sometime, okay?
David,
Great post. I find that questions about prayer, healing, and the role of believers in the process to be numerous and sometimes full of dissention. I have to say that I agree with most everything you’ve written, though I must admit that I lean more heavily to the spiritual connection of Isaiah 53:5 and 1 Peter 2:24 as it relates the the atoning sacrifice of Christ and the redemption of God’s elect. Perhaps I’ve had too many experiences with people quoting those verses as though they were incantations of some sort. Perhaps not. I’m still learning a lot about these things, but would you agree that the emphasis is more on the spiritual than the physical? Thanks for a great post. I always look forward to reading your material.
Andrew
Andrew,
Yes, I agree the healing wrought in the atonement is primarily spiritual. However, I reject the view, often espoused by cessationists, that it is exclusively spiritual. I also find it hard to read the Bible objectively (especially the Gospels) and reach the conclusion that God does not place a high degree of importance on alleviating the physical suffering of people this side of heaven.
David:
You were one of several folks I thought about when I read this devotional today at Christian Century.
http://www.christiancentury.org/article.lasso?id=6892
Do cut and paste the url and click over.
Forgive me for being a little off topic, but I think you will relish the insight of this fellow, as we all Make for Home.